Currently accepted views on contagion are based on the concept of Transmission Chains (aka Chains of Infection) [1] and are usually described by very simplified and reductionist Compartmental Models in Epidemiology [2] such as the SIR model (Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered); which are characterized by the Basic Reproduction Number (R_0).
In other words, epidemiology is built on a very shaky foundation defined by simple models that cannot possibly account for the extreme variability, infinite degrees of freedom, and countless unknowns present in the natural world. Hence epidemiologists cannot protect us or save us from anything. It's as if the whole field was formed to prevent us from falling off the edge of the earth.
"One of the earliest instances of modern epidemiology can be found during an 1854 cholera outbreak in London(link is external and opens in a new window). Doctors believed the widespread illness must have been airborne, but Dr. John Snow, widely considered to be the father of epidemiology, employed a different kind of thinking. By carefully mapping the outbreak and analyzing those who were infected, Snow was able to link every cholera case to a single water pump at the intersection of Broad and Cambridge Streets (now Lexington Street) in London’s Soho neighborhood. The removal of the pump stopped the disease in its tracks—laying the basis of today’s epidemiological practices."
I agree it can clearly be useful when dealing with “macro” pathogens distributed in limited ranges as in your example (in this case from a true point source). Respiratory and other viral illnesses, the supposed cause of “pandemics”, not so much.
A little to complex for me i.e. it seems to me within the "virus" context epidemiologists will rely on the "data" provided. Scurvy I'm led to believe was thought of as a "contagious" illness until it was realized that it was a vitamin C deficiency. RFK Jr. has openly stated that 5G increases the absorption of toxins. Carcinogenic glyphosate is a toxin and Dr. Stephanie Seneff puts forward that Glyphosate reduces the body's ability to absorb vitamin D. Some speculate that graphene oxide was put into 2019 flu jabs, others have shown how graphene oxide, in 2020, was introduced in masks, medications, and cereal. Graphene Oxide can enhance the pickup of Electromagnetic Frequencies i.e. increasing the body's receptivity to 5G and thus indirectly causing a vitamin D deficiency within the general population.
Women who work together tend to synchronize their menstrual cycles. This sync is apparently due to an "enzyme" (I'm sure subconscious communication may play a role). If people can sync an old-blood detox experience, perhaps they can also sync an alternative detox experience that's more nasal in expression.
Electromagnetic Frequencies + Toxification = "COVID-19" (prove me wrong)
If the above or a "no-virus" version explanation is valid, then it would be imperative to look into how "new novel sequences" get "identified" and if there a flaws within the "sequencing" that can be exploited i.e. adding a sequence to a larger sequence on the computer, etc. then, this would need further investigation, no?
Could "they" have pre-created the "Spike Protein" computer sequence for a pre-planned PLANdemic
Should what I've laid down be a more truthful view of what "CvD" was, then we as mankind are potentially in an extremely vulnerable situation i.e. a synergy between a toxin (spike protein) that has been injected with a graphene-coated hydrogel at scale poses a problem, especially if that toxin has the capabilities of shape-shifting when exposed to specific electromagnetic pulses i.e. a new PLANdemic can be initiated with the use of AI so as to "qualify" the epidemiological "spread". Made to look like a "virus outbreak".
Electromagnetic Programable Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) & Bio-Synthetic Life Forms (Spike Glycol-Proteins) - Karen Kingston & Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea
In your scenario there would be no correlation between clinical symptoms and the presence or absence of any particular genomic pattern. Whether genomic patterns are miscategorized or not, and to what degree, might have been the main driver for overdiagnosis, misdiagnosis, and misapplied health care protocols. That alone would have caused sufficient harm. If environmental toxins (as you suggest) played a role, the effects might have varied considerably from region to region. Overdiagnosis and inappropriate use of molecular tests would have masked this effect, for the most part. However, given that there were two clearly distinct phases during the covid event; one with high excess mortality in a very limited number of locations and specific hospitals within those very same locations (e.g., Bergamo, Madrid, New York...); and one with pretty much normal respiratory infections and normal overall mortality but significant numbers of "cases" due to overtesting and misdiagnosis; we could speculate that something else was going on.
the "high" rates is in relation to mortality numbers, this doesn't qualify that the deaths were due to the alleged "virus" just because the RT-PCR tests may have claimed so i.e. ...
Use of an "Emergency Use Calibrated" x45 cycled RT-PCR test is likely to be massively false. This is an issue that Dr. Stephan Lanka has shown to be problematic. Use of a prior "primer" sequence (especially one aligned with human expression i.e. human mucosal sample) can render false positives. We have no idea if synthetic nanoparticles containing genome codes to be tested against have been dropped into the atmosphere by x3 "Chinese" balloons or not. We know there are chemtrails, or just problematic spaying activity, that have been shown to increase barium and aluminum in snow. We know that Glyphosate has to be manufactured before being sprayed on our food (gain-of-function toxin). The "Spike Protein" was specifically designed to contain the ACE-2 furin cleaver (odd it moved). This suited the mRNA mission (which came first?).
DDT was sprayed on people before they injected a little of it into people, first, it created polio, then they filtrated that jab and blamed polio on the "invisible virus" within the poliovaxsin (clever). This time they introduced graphene in masks, medications, and cereal - then later injected graphene into people - who's to say that synthetic nanoparticles of the spike-protein or "full genome" (not a "virus", just a toxin) - of "SARS-Cov-2's were not manufactured into aerosolized form. Apparently the graphene-coated hydrogel, that transports the mRNA to all organs of the body, can also be aerosolized. This type of behavior could ensure that "tests" were more believable and the "flu-like symptoms" (detox + vitamin D deficiency) could be reflected in jab symptoms too (Hormesis Science is about the quantity of exposure). external and internal.
There are more than enough issues with the tests and the sequencing to even need to add this "layer of nanoparticle deployment conspiracy" into the mix. Dr. Ardis did that with the "Venom in the municipal water" idea. He thought the "Spike Protein" was founded on venom peptide sequences - so that keeps that idea a little alive. Some blame "smart dust" or "parasites in the fog" - there are numerous views, but during 2020 we have the need for the Midazolam + Remdesivir murders based on positive RT-PCR (wow). Once the injections were deployed, all "sequencing" became part of a "Self-professing sequence prophecy".
I hope what I'm putting down makes sense - I'm just about to write an article on vitamin D - and I'll pop back to this comment and share it with you when it's done. They thought scurvy was contagious. We synchronize detoxing. Out-fection is different from "in-fection", but one can create a genome sequence from "either" expression.
I think that Dr. Ardis said that Glyphosate could also have a venom peptide sequence within it's sequence, but I could be wrong.
The first injections caused the bulk of the injuries, I believe close to 75% i.e. then it phased out. There were batches that were more lethal and some were spread out. That is what happened with the injections, who's to say that an initial toxin attack coupled with the 5G rollout, likely focused on the elderly could not have occurred? then it dispersed (batches) - obviously, I don't have evidence, but I think this article has enough to consider
Electromagnetic Frequencies + Toxification = "COVID-19" (prove me wrong)
In other words, epidemiology is built on a very shaky foundation defined by simple models that cannot possibly account for the extreme variability, infinite degrees of freedom, and countless unknowns present in the natural world. Hence epidemiologists cannot protect us or save us from anything. It's as if the whole field was formed to prevent us from falling off the edge of the earth.
I mostly agree, however in some instances epidemiology is (or was) actually very helpful. Example (source https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/what-epidemiology):
"One of the earliest instances of modern epidemiology can be found during an 1854 cholera outbreak in London(link is external and opens in a new window). Doctors believed the widespread illness must have been airborne, but Dr. John Snow, widely considered to be the father of epidemiology, employed a different kind of thinking. By carefully mapping the outbreak and analyzing those who were infected, Snow was able to link every cholera case to a single water pump at the intersection of Broad and Cambridge Streets (now Lexington Street) in London’s Soho neighborhood. The removal of the pump stopped the disease in its tracks—laying the basis of today’s epidemiological practices."
I agree it can clearly be useful when dealing with “macro” pathogens distributed in limited ranges as in your example (in this case from a true point source). Respiratory and other viral illnesses, the supposed cause of “pandemics”, not so much.
A little to complex for me i.e. it seems to me within the "virus" context epidemiologists will rely on the "data" provided. Scurvy I'm led to believe was thought of as a "contagious" illness until it was realized that it was a vitamin C deficiency. RFK Jr. has openly stated that 5G increases the absorption of toxins. Carcinogenic glyphosate is a toxin and Dr. Stephanie Seneff puts forward that Glyphosate reduces the body's ability to absorb vitamin D. Some speculate that graphene oxide was put into 2019 flu jabs, others have shown how graphene oxide, in 2020, was introduced in masks, medications, and cereal. Graphene Oxide can enhance the pickup of Electromagnetic Frequencies i.e. increasing the body's receptivity to 5G and thus indirectly causing a vitamin D deficiency within the general population.
Women who work together tend to synchronize their menstrual cycles. This sync is apparently due to an "enzyme" (I'm sure subconscious communication may play a role). If people can sync an old-blood detox experience, perhaps they can also sync an alternative detox experience that's more nasal in expression.
Electromagnetic Frequencies + Toxification = "COVID-19" (prove me wrong)
https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/electromagnetic-frequencies-toxification
If the above or a "no-virus" version explanation is valid, then it would be imperative to look into how "new novel sequences" get "identified" and if there a flaws within the "sequencing" that can be exploited i.e. adding a sequence to a larger sequence on the computer, etc. then, this would need further investigation, no?
Could "they" have pre-created the "Spike Protein" computer sequence for a pre-planned PLANdemic
https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/could-they-have-pre-created-the-spike
Should what I've laid down be a more truthful view of what "CvD" was, then we as mankind are potentially in an extremely vulnerable situation i.e. a synergy between a toxin (spike protein) that has been injected with a graphene-coated hydrogel at scale poses a problem, especially if that toxin has the capabilities of shape-shifting when exposed to specific electromagnetic pulses i.e. a new PLANdemic can be initiated with the use of AI so as to "qualify" the epidemiological "spread". Made to look like a "virus outbreak".
Electromagnetic Programable Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) & Bio-Synthetic Life Forms (Spike Glycol-Proteins) - Karen Kingston & Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea
https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/electromagnetic-programable-lipid
In your scenario there would be no correlation between clinical symptoms and the presence or absence of any particular genomic pattern. Whether genomic patterns are miscategorized or not, and to what degree, might have been the main driver for overdiagnosis, misdiagnosis, and misapplied health care protocols. That alone would have caused sufficient harm. If environmental toxins (as you suggest) played a role, the effects might have varied considerably from region to region. Overdiagnosis and inappropriate use of molecular tests would have masked this effect, for the most part. However, given that there were two clearly distinct phases during the covid event; one with high excess mortality in a very limited number of locations and specific hospitals within those very same locations (e.g., Bergamo, Madrid, New York...); and one with pretty much normal respiratory infections and normal overall mortality but significant numbers of "cases" due to overtesting and misdiagnosis; we could speculate that something else was going on.
the "high" rates is in relation to mortality numbers, this doesn't qualify that the deaths were due to the alleged "virus" just because the RT-PCR tests may have claimed so i.e. ...
Was it an RT-PCR PLANdemic?
https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/was-it-a-rt-pcr-plandemic
Use of an "Emergency Use Calibrated" x45 cycled RT-PCR test is likely to be massively false. This is an issue that Dr. Stephan Lanka has shown to be problematic. Use of a prior "primer" sequence (especially one aligned with human expression i.e. human mucosal sample) can render false positives. We have no idea if synthetic nanoparticles containing genome codes to be tested against have been dropped into the atmosphere by x3 "Chinese" balloons or not. We know there are chemtrails, or just problematic spaying activity, that have been shown to increase barium and aluminum in snow. We know that Glyphosate has to be manufactured before being sprayed on our food (gain-of-function toxin). The "Spike Protein" was specifically designed to contain the ACE-2 furin cleaver (odd it moved). This suited the mRNA mission (which came first?).
DDT was sprayed on people before they injected a little of it into people, first, it created polio, then they filtrated that jab and blamed polio on the "invisible virus" within the poliovaxsin (clever). This time they introduced graphene in masks, medications, and cereal - then later injected graphene into people - who's to say that synthetic nanoparticles of the spike-protein or "full genome" (not a "virus", just a toxin) - of "SARS-Cov-2's were not manufactured into aerosolized form. Apparently the graphene-coated hydrogel, that transports the mRNA to all organs of the body, can also be aerosolized. This type of behavior could ensure that "tests" were more believable and the "flu-like symptoms" (detox + vitamin D deficiency) could be reflected in jab symptoms too (Hormesis Science is about the quantity of exposure). external and internal.
There are more than enough issues with the tests and the sequencing to even need to add this "layer of nanoparticle deployment conspiracy" into the mix. Dr. Ardis did that with the "Venom in the municipal water" idea. He thought the "Spike Protein" was founded on venom peptide sequences - so that keeps that idea a little alive. Some blame "smart dust" or "parasites in the fog" - there are numerous views, but during 2020 we have the need for the Midazolam + Remdesivir murders based on positive RT-PCR (wow). Once the injections were deployed, all "sequencing" became part of a "Self-professing sequence prophecy".
I hope what I'm putting down makes sense - I'm just about to write an article on vitamin D - and I'll pop back to this comment and share it with you when it's done. They thought scurvy was contagious. We synchronize detoxing. Out-fection is different from "in-fection", but one can create a genome sequence from "either" expression.
I think that Dr. Ardis said that Glyphosate could also have a venom peptide sequence within it's sequence, but I could be wrong.
The first injections caused the bulk of the injuries, I believe close to 75% i.e. then it phased out. There were batches that were more lethal and some were spread out. That is what happened with the injections, who's to say that an initial toxin attack coupled with the 5G rollout, likely focused on the elderly could not have occurred? then it dispersed (batches) - obviously, I don't have evidence, but I think this article has enough to consider
Electromagnetic Frequencies + Toxification = "COVID-19" (prove me wrong)
https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/electromagnetic-frequencies-toxification