Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jamie Andrews's avatar

OK. Your assumption is that DPL's Substack is anything other than reporting on the project.

1. Your point that CPE is caused by bacterial contamination is ridiculous, what do you think the Antibiotics are for? 😂😂.. also we used the protocols of the ATCC for the methodology IF these are encouraging contamination the ENTIRE methodology of EVERY isolation is the same hence it is falsified, you can't have it both ways unfortunately.

2. Sure DPL has seemingly written that the CRO identified the "Viruses", this is incorrect. We are falsifying PURELY the EM part by VISUALS alone... if we have found IDENTICAL LOOKING particles that need to be further tested outside of EM to discern WHAT these particles are we have falsified EM. Which we have done.

3. You then go into the realms of fantasy talking about genomics. We have released NO control studies on the genomics part YET so your entire premise that we "CAN'T" is a strawman.

It is typical conjecture and pseudoscience just ASSUMING a dye flourescing amd being picked up by a camera means anything tangible whatsoever. You would need to provide proof of a nucleotide even existing before heading into the fantasy realms of finding all sorts of indicative sequences.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts